Project presentation and questions
Overview
A project involves the apprentice completing a significant and defined piece of work that has a real business application and benefit. The project must start after the apprentice has gone through the gateway.
The project presentation and questions must be structured to give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this EPA method to the highest available grade.
The project must meet the needs of the employer’s business and be relevant to the apprentice’s occupation and apprenticeship. The EPAO must confirm that it provides the apprentice with the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this EPA method to the highest available grade. The EPAO must refer to the grading descriptors to ensure that projects are pitched appropriately.
This EPA method includes 2 components:
- a project with a project report
- presentation with questions and answers
The project and any components must be assessed holistically by the independent assessor when they are deciding the grade for this EPA method.
Rationale
This EPA method is being used because it enables a defined piece of work to be undertaken after the gateway to demonstrate particular aspects of the occupation. The project reflects the approach taken to record scientific laboratory work. It would not be possible to observe the apprentice complete these activities as it would take too long and not be practical to schedule alongside existing work. Technician scientists are required to present the results of scientific work and so the presentation reflects the requirements of the role. The questioning enables underpinning knowledge and understanding to be assessed. This method enables synoptic assessment of knowledge, skills, and behaviours.
Component 1: Project in the form of a project report
Delivery
Apprentices must complete a project which may be based on:
- a scientific experiment and investigation
To ensure the project allows the apprentice to meet the KSBs mapped to this EPA method to the highest available grade, the EPAO should sign-off the project’s title and scope at the gateway to confirm it is suitable.
The project must be in the form of a report.
The apprentice must start the project after the gateway. They must complete and submit the report to the EPAO after a maximum of 8 weeks. The employer should ensure the apprentice has the time and resources within this period, to plan and complete their project. The apprentice must complete their project and the production of all its components unaided.
The apprentice may work as part of a team which could include technical internal or external support. However, the project report must be the apprentice’s own work and will be reflective of their own role and contribution. The apprentice and their employer must confirm that the project report is the apprentice’s own work when it is submitted.
The report must include at least:
- an evaluation report of a laboratory-based investigation and scientific experiment that the apprentice has carried out post gateway
As a minimum, all projects must include:
- planning the investigation and scientific experiment, prioritising tasks, and the selection and review of scientific techniques and laboratory equipment to be used
- collaboration with stakeholders and how the impact of work on others was considered
- how scientific techniques were selected to meet the objectives
- the systematic recording and storage of information
- how data analysis and interpretation informed actions or recommendations
- summary of findings
The project report has a maximum word count of 3000 words. A tolerance of 10% above or below the word count is allowed at the apprentice’s discretion. Appendices, references and diagrams are not included in this total. The project report must map, in an appendix, how it evidences the relevant KSBs mapped to this EPA method.
Component 2: Presentation with questioning
Delivery
This is a formal presentation where an apprentice will present to an independent assessor on a set subject. The independent assessor must ask questions. Apprentices must prepare, submit and deliver a presentation. The presentation is restricted to the KSBs allocated to this EPA method as shown in the mapping section of this document.
The presentation and questioning must last 75 minutes This will typically include a presentation of 30 minutes and questioning lasting 45 minutes.
The independent assessor must ask at least 8 questions. They must use the questions from the EPAO’s question bank or create their own questions in-line with the EPAO’s training. Follow up questions are allowed where clarification is required.
The purpose of the independent assessor’s questions will be to check the underpinning knowledge and understanding of the apprentice and to ensure coverage of the KSBs mapped to the method.
The presentation will provide an overview of the apprentice’s project.. Independent assessors will ask questions after the presentation. The presentation should build on the report and the apprentice should:
- present results of the scientific work including mathematical concepts that were used
- justify how they considered the most appropriate scientific techniques to apply and how they ensured that any analysis was reliable and accurate
- reference the evidence used to inform the results
- describe the lessons learned
The apprentice must prepare and submit their presentation to the EPAO at the same time as the report which is a maximum of 8 weeks after the gateway.
The apprentice must notify the EPAO, at the submission of the presentation, of any technical requirements for the presentation. For the presentation, the apprentice will have access to:
- audio-visual presentation equipment
- flip chart and writing and drawing materials
- computer
- any other requirements as previously notified to the EPAO
The independent assessor must have at least 2 weeks to review the project report and presentation before the presentation is delivered by the apprentice, to allow them to prepare appropriate questions.
Apprentices must be given at least 2 weeks notice of the date and time of the presentation and question and answer session.
Assessment location
The presentation with questioning must take place in a suitable venue selected by the EPAO for example the EPAO’s or employer’s premises. The presentation with questioning should take place in a quiet room, free from distractions and influence.
The presentation with questioning can be conducted by video conferencing. The EPAO must have processes in place to verify the identity of the apprentice and ensure the apprentice is not being aided.
Question and resource development
EPAOs must write an assessment specification and question bank. The specification must be relevant to the occupation and demonstrate how to assess the KSBs shown in the mapping. It is recommended this is done in consultation with employers of this occupation. EPAOs should maintain the security and confidentiality of EPA materials when consulting employers. The questions must be unpredictable. A question bank of sufficient size will support this. The assessment specification and questions must be reviewed at least once a year to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose.
EPAOs will develop purpose-built question banks and ensure that appropriate quality assurance procedures are in place. For example, considering standardisation, training and moderation.
EPAOs will ensure that questions are refined and developed to a high standard.
EPAOs must ensure that apprentices have a different set of questions in the case of re-sits or re- takes.
- independent assessor EPA materials which include:
- training materials
- administration materials
- moderation and standardisation materials
- guidance materials
- grading guidance
- question bank
- EPA guidance for the apprentice and employer
Professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio of evidence
Overview
In the discussion, an independent assessor and apprentice have a formal two-way conversation.
The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence. It gives the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate their competency across the KSBs mapped to this EPA method.
Rationale
This EPA method is being used because it will allow KSBs which may not naturally occur in every workplace or may take too long to observe to be assessed. It also enables the assessment of a disparate set of KSBs. The professional discussion will enable underpinning knowledge to be tested. It reflects the requirement for Technician Scientists to communicate their approach to work when carrying out their everyday duties.
Delivery
The professional discussion must be structured to give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method to the highest available grade.
An independent assessor must conduct and assess the professional discussion.
The purpose of the independent assessor’s questions will be to draw out contextualised examples, further clarify skills demonstrated in the portfolio and be used to ask open questions tailored to the role and environment.
A minimum of 1 question will be asked for each of the following themes:
- perform lab tasks
- calibrate and use equipment
- record keeping and communication
- continuous improvement
The EPAO must give an apprentice 2 weeks notice of the professional discussion.
The independent assessor must have at least 2 week(s) to review the supporting documentation. The apprentice must have access to their portfolio of evidence during the professional discussion.
The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence is however the portfolio of evidence is not directly assessed.
The professional discussion must last for 105 minutes. The independent assessor can increase the time of the professional discussion by up to 10%. This time is to allow the apprentice to respond to a question if necessary.
The independent assessor must ask at least 4 questions. Follow-up questions are allowed where clarification is required. The independent assessor must use the questions from their EPAO’s question bank or create their own questions in-line with the EPAO’s training.
The independent assessor must make the grading decision. The independent assessor must keep accurate records of the assessment. They must record:
- the apprentice’s answers to questions
- the KSBs demonstrated in answers to questions
- the grade achieved
Assessment location
The professional discussion must take place in a suitable venue selected by the EPAO (for example the EPAO’s or employer’s premises).
The professional discussion can be conducted by video conferencing. The EPAO must have processes in place to verify the identity of the apprentice and ensure the apprentice is not being aided.
The professional discussion should take place in a quiet room, free from distractions and influence.
Question and resource development
The EPAO must develop a purpose-built assessment specification and question bank. It is recommended this is done in consultation with employers of this occupation. The EPAO should maintain the security and confidentiality of EPA materials when consulting employers. The assessment specification and question bank must be reviewed at least once a year to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose.
The assessment specification must be relevant to the occupation and demonstrate how to assess the KSBs mapped to this assessment method. The EPAO must ensure that questions are refined and developed to a high standard. The questions must be unpredictable. A question bank of sufficient size will support this.
The EPAO must ensure that apprentice has a different set of questions in the case of re-sits or re- takes.
The EPAO must produce the following materials to support the professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio of evidence:
- Independent assessor assessment materials which include:
- training materials
- administration materials
- moderation and standardisation materials
- guidance materials
- grading guidance
- question bank
- EPA guidance for the apprentice and the employer
The EPAO must ensure that the EPA materials are subject to quality assurance procedures including standardisation, training, and moderation.